Compliance that runs in your pipeline, not in a spreadsheet.

SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, ISO 27001, PIPEDA and GDPR controls built into your infrastructure, with evidence collected every time code ships.

SOC 2HIPAAPCI-DSSISO 27001PIPEDAGDPR
7 momedian time to SOC 2 Type II readiness, starting from zero
0critical findings across our last 11 external penetration tests
100%of active compliance clients audit-ready in the quarter they needed
/frameworks

The frameworks we build for.

We recommend only the frameworks your business actually needs, then engineer the controls into code.

USSOC 2 Type II

Proof that your controls operated over time, with evidence collected continuously.

How we do it →
USHIPAA

Security Rule safeguards for ePHI, from encryption to tamper-evident logs and BAAs.

How we do it →
GlobalPCI-DSS

Secure payment pipelines, encrypted cardholder data and segmentation.

How we do it →
GlobalISO 27001

An information security management system mapped to real pipeline controls.

How we do it →
CanadaPIPEDA

Canadian privacy obligations and data residency built into the architecture.

How we do it →
EU & UKGDPR

Privacy by design, per-tenant encryption and access controls.

How we do it →
CanadaOSFI E-21 & B-10

Operational resilience and third-party risk for federally regulated finance.

How we do it →
GlobalAML/KYC & VASP

Identity, transaction monitoring and audit trails for money movement and crypto.

How we do it →
/readiness

From gap found to gap closed.

Every audit maps your stack against the controls auditors and enterprise buyers ask about. Then we close the gaps in code, so they stay closed.

6/9controls passing
Map your readiness
MFA on admin accountsSOC 2 · HIPAAPass
Least-privilege IAMSOC 2 · PIPEDAPass
Secrets out of CI logsSOC 2Gap found
Encryption at restHIPAA · GDPRPass
AI agent permissionsSOC 2 · GDPRGap found
Audit loggingSOC 2 · HIPAAPass
Backups & DR testedSOC 2 · HIPAAPass
Quarterly access reviewsSOC 2 · HIPAAGap found
Data residencyPIPEDA · GDPRPass
PassGap foundExample readiness map from an audit report
/continuous-compliance

Evidence that already exists.

Four steps from pipeline audit to audit-ready, built in.

01

Map Your Pipeline and Compliance Gaps Honestly

Where security testing already happens, where it doesn't, and what evidence an auditor would ask for that you couldn't currently produce.

Gap map
02

Build Policy as Code Around Real Requirements

Not a generic template, guardrails that reflect the specific controls your compliance framework actually requires, enforced automatically.

Guardrails
03

Integrate Security Pipeline Automation

SAST, DAST, IAST, and SCA running on every commit, with secret scanning and signed artifacts closing the gaps left between them.

Every commit
04

Build Continuous Compliance Evidence

Every control, every scan result, every deployment gets logged in a form that's actually usable in an audit, generated automatically.

Always on
/sample

What a readiness score looks like.

From the sample audit we run for a US payments fintech of about 80 people.

Open the full sample report
SOC 2 control areaStatus
Access controlPartial
Change managementPartial
Logging & monitoringGap
Backup & recoveryPartial
EncryptionIn place
/faq

Questions teams ask before the first call.

Traditional application security usually means a review near the end of a release cycle, done by a separate team. DevSecOps builds the same testing and policy enforcement directly into the pipeline your engineers already use, running continuously instead of as a gate at the end.

SOC 2 Type II requires demonstrating controls operated effectively over time, not just that they exist on paper. Continuous compliance evidence collection is exactly the kind of ongoing proof a SOC 2 Type II audit requires, generated automatically instead of assembled manually before the audit window.

SAST scans your source code for vulnerabilities before it runs. DAST tests the running application from the outside, the way an attacker would. IAST combines both by instrumenting the app during real testing. SCA audits your open-source dependencies for known vulnerabilities.

Yes, if you're running AI models or agents in production, traditional application security testing wasn't built for risks like prompt injection or manipulated model outputs. AI red-teaming is a distinct discipline testing for those specific failure modes.

/free-audit

Audit or funding round coming up?

Start with a free review of your cloud, CI/CD, access and AI setup against SOC 2, HIPAA, PIPEDA and GDPR controls.