DevSecOps Compliance Services
Built so the evidence already exists before an auditor ever asks for it.
Triotech Systems builds security directly into your delivery pipeline as a programmatic practice, from policy-as-code guardrails to dedicated AI red-teaming against live models, turning continuous compliance into a natural byproduct of how your team already ships code, not a dreaded process bolted on before an audit.
What are DevSecOps compliance services?
The plain version
Taking the old model, where a security team reviews code near the end and a compliance team audits everything once a year, and replacing it with something that runs continuously and automatically inside the same pipeline your engineers already use to ship. The evidence gets generated as a byproduct of engineering work that was already happening, not assembled manually before an audit.
Clear lines of ownership.
What the platform gives you, what we take on, and what you get at the end.
Security Pipeline Automation
SAST, DAST, IAST, and SCA running on every commit instead of once before a release, so gaps get caught while code is still moving.
Policy as Code & AI Red-Teaming
Policy-as-code guardrails, signed artifacts, and AI red-teaming against your own models, built around your actual requirements, not a template.
Evidence That Already Exists
Evidence an auditor asks for already exists, generated automatically every time code moves through the pipeline, not assembled under deadline.
Here's what's actually in scope.
What's included
- Policy-as-code guardrails enforced automatically across your CI/CD pipeline
- SAST, DAST, IAST, and SCA security pipeline automationOn every commit.
- AI red-teamingFor models and agents in production.
- Secret scanningSigned artifacts, and supply-chain attestation.
- Continuous compliance evidence mapped to SOC 2ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, or HIPAA.
- Policy-as-code guardrails enforced automatically across your CI/CD pipeline (repeat, loop)
- Zero trust architecture guidanceFor identity and access.
- Quarterly penetration testing and vulnerability management
Four steps, one outcome: evidence that already exists.
PIPELINE AUDIT → AUDIT-READY EVIDENCE, BUILT IN
Map Your Pipeline and Compliance Gaps Honestly
Where security testing already happens, where it doesn't, and what evidence an auditor would ask for that you couldn't currently produce.
Build Policy as Code Around Real Requirements
Not a generic template, guardrails that reflect the specific controls your compliance framework actually requires, enforced automatically.
Integrate Security Pipeline Automation
SAST, DAST, IAST, and SCA running on every commit, with secret scanning and signed artifacts closing the gaps left between them.
Build Continuous Compliance Evidence
Every control, every scan result, every deployment gets logged in a form that's actually usable in an audit, generated automatically.
A track record auditors sign off on
Numbers matter more than promises here.
Built on real credentials, not just process.
Why choose us
Running Production Since 2020
Building security directly into delivery pipelines since 2020, for fintech, healthcare, crypto, and e-commerce clients who can't afford a gap.
One Practice, Every Regulated Industry
The same policy-as-code and evidence collection practice shows up whether we're securing fintech payments, healthcare PHI, or crypto exchanges.
Compliance as a Floor, Not a Ceiling
Compliance as a Floor, Not a Ceiling Meeting the minimum SOC 2 checklist and actually being secure aren't always the same thing, we build toward genuine security posture first.
We Measure Audit Outcomes, Not Activity
Median 7 months to SOC 2 Type II readiness from zero, 0 critical findings across our last 11 penetration tests, the numbers that matter.
Real Credentials, Not Marketing Language
Our founder holds CISSP and CSSLP certifications, the second one focused specifically on secure software lifecycle, the actual discipline here.
We Compete on Numbers, Not Buzzwords
The automation and continuous evidence collection are the actual substance here, not a marketing layer attached to conventional consulting.
Why choose Triotech?
One team, six disciplines
AIOps, Cloud & FinOps, DevSecOps, Data & MLOps, AI Agents & QA, and product engineering.
Certified security leadership
CISSP, CSSLP, and DevSecOps-certified leadership sets the technical bar for every engagement, not just the sales conversation.
Multi-vertical experience
Engagements across finance, healthcare, and other regulated industries, where compliance and uptime requirements are non-negotiable.
Toronto-based since 2020
An engineering studio with a Toronto base, direct technical leadership, and a global engineering bench supporting clients across time zones.
Agile, CI/CD-driven delivery
Solutions shipped through automated development workflows and continuous integration/deployment, so releases stay fast without skipping review.
This work, in production.
Real engagements with numbers attached.
All case studiesHow a US fintech went from manual laptop releases to a secure 10-minute pipeline
Read case studyHow The Schools Platform went from an idea to a secure, multi-tenant SaaS in 12 months
Read case studyHow FellaRide closed every critical security gap before scaling
Read case studyNo flat number. A scoped proposal instead.
How it works
There's no flat number that would mean anything here, a startup needing SOC 2 Type II readiness from scratch is a different engagement than an established fintech platform adding AI red-teaming to an already mature practice. We'll start with an honest look at your pipeline and compliance posture, and come back with a scoped proposal so you know the real cost and timeline before committing.
Questions about DevSecOps Compliance.
Traditional application security usually means a review near the end of a release cycle, done by a separate team. DevSecOps builds the same testing and policy enforcement directly into the pipeline your engineers already use, running continuously instead of as a gate at the end.
SOC 2 Type II requires demonstrating controls operated effectively over time, not just that they exist on paper. Continuous compliance evidence collection is exactly the kind of ongoing proof a SOC 2 Type II audit requires, generated automatically instead of assembled manually before the audit window.
SAST scans your source code for vulnerabilities before it runs. DAST tests the running application from the outside, the way an attacker would. IAST combines both by instrumenting the app during real testing. SCA audits your open-source dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
Yes, if you're running AI models or agents in production, traditional application security testing wasn't built for risks like prompt injection or manipulated model outputs. AI red-teaming is a distinct discipline testing for those specific failure modes.
Find out what your stack is hiding.
A security architect reviews your cloud, CI/CD and AI setup. Written report in five business days. Free.